The Escape from Crippling Depression đ(^__^)
293 posts
I probably has less than 1000 days. I pray for the best but my current reality and intuition says something otherwise. Iâll get my estate established this year for sure.
Alan Turing, Cybernetics and the Secrets of Life
Another outstanding mini-documentary from Aaron and Melissa Dykes which explains more about the history of scientific mind control.
Expansion of ideas on cybernetics, and an analysis in Alan Turingâs role in not only creating Intelligent Machinery, but his little-known role in probing the chemical formation of genetic/biological life through morphogenesis.
Quoted Sources & Recommended Reading: -BrâŠ
View On WordPress
âTo be fully alive, fully human, and completely awake is to be continually thrown out of the nest. To live fully is to be always in no-manâs-land, to experience each moment as completely new and fresh. To live is to be willing to die over and over again.â
â Pema ChödrönÂ
May the Universe continue to guide me into opportunities for growth, renewal, and love.
May my heart be filled with overflowing compassion for my life and the lives of all others.
May my spirit shed all of Her doubts and hesitations.
May I find abundance in each new day.
May I be at peace.
The only acceptable reason to wake me early đ
The crown will always own your land with their property tax system. Property tax is theft of property.
Genomics:
What is Genomics?
In 1970s Scientist Found the DNA Series of Simple Living Life. It is Branch Of Science, Based on Anatomy, Drawing, Function, Progress, and Modification of Genome. Genomics is Complete Study of the Genomes of Creatures. A Genome is Entire Set of Creatures DNA, Containing All of Its Genes. Its Key Task is Find The Complete Series of DNA or Structure of the Molecules that Build the DNA and the Chemical Chain Between The DNA Molecules. DNA Sequencing Knowledge is Not Only Very essential For The Biological Research But Equally Important in Medical, Medicine, Biotechnology & In Forensic Research etc.
Following are the Key Genomic Research Areas:
1. Meta-Genomics: MetaGenomics is Study of Genetic Substance Which is Gain or Cultivated From Environmental Pattern/Sample. It is Also Known as Ecogenomics, Community Genomics, and Environmental Genomics.
2. Human Genomics: As Name Suggested Human Genomics Is Concentrate on Study of Human Genome Sequence. The Human Genomics is the Entire Set of Nucleic Acid Sequences for Humans, It Found in DNA Within the Pair of 23 Chromosomes in Cell Nuclei and Small DNA Molecule Found separately in Mitochondria.
3. Bacteriophage Genomics: It is Also Known As Phage, it is Study of Genomics Which Infect Bacteria. Phages are ubiquitous viruses, found wherever bacteria Occurs. Bacteria Found in Soil or the animalâs intestines.
4. Pharmacogenomics: This is Branch Of Genomics Studies, Learn About the Impact of Genetic Changes on the Drugs Efficiency and Toxicity, and Plays Very Key Role in Optimization of Medicine Therapy.
5. Cyanobacteria genomics: This is Area of genomic Investigation is Focusing on the study of cyanobacteria, a phylum of bacteria which get Strength through photosynthesis.
Bioinformatics:
What is Bioinformatics?
Bioinformatics is the Application of Information Technology, Used to Generate Methods and Software Tool For getting Knowledge of Biological data or Living Things. It is Used For Solving Biological Problems.
Bioinformatics is helpful for Create and Implements Computer Programs That Gives Access to Handle, Use and Manage the Information. it is Also Helpful to Develop New Algorithms and Statical Measures That Is Very Useful to Access Large Data.
1. Functional Gene Annotations / Genome Annotation: Gene Annotation is the Action of recognizing the Place of Genes and Entire Coding Zone in a Genome and Find What Those Genes Actually Do.
There Are Three Main Steps For Genome Annotation:
a. Recognize Section of Genome That does not Code For Proteins.
b. Recognise Elements of the  Genome, A action Called Gene Prediction.
c. Connect Biological Information to These Elements.
2. Next-generation sequencing (NGS): It is Fresh Process for Sequencing Genome at High Speed & Less Cost. Next Generation Sequencing  Also Called Second Generation Sequencing(SGS) or Massively Parallel Sequencing(MPS). NGS Generate a Large Amount of Sequence Data. NGS Plays Key Role in the Big Y Test From Family Tree DNA & Y Prime, Y-Elite & While Genome Test From Full Genomes Corporation. The Mitochondrial DNA full Series test uses next-generation sequencing technology (NGS).
3. Gene / Orf Prediction: An Gene/ Orf Prediction is the Element of Reading Frame That Has Capacity to Translated.
4. Genome alignment and Analysis: In Bioinformatics, Sequence Analysis is the Action of Subject to RNA, & DNA. Methods applied for Sequence Alignment, Searches Opposite Biological Database.
5. Multiple sequence alignment: MSA is Normally the Alignment of Three Or More than three Biological Sequences of Equal Length, Generally Protein, RNA & DNA.
6. BLAST / BLAT Data Analysis: Blat is Pairwise Sequence Alignment Algorithm Was Created By Jim Kent At UCSC in the 2000s to Help the Assembly & Notation of Human Genome.
7. Comparative Genomics: Comparative Genomics is an area of Biological Research in WhichGenomis Characteristics of Distinct Creatures are Compared. The Genomic Characteristics Consist the DNA Sequence, Gene Order, Genes, Regulatory Sequences & Another Genomics Landmark.
how to be productive after school
how to have a productive year
how to be as productive as Hermione Granger
how to study for longer
how to increase productivity and get stuff done
how to stay focused, motivated and on track
planning apps
what to do when youâre super distracted
top 10 productivity tips
productivity hack ft google cal
easy organisation tips that increase productivity
#SundayMorning #AMJoy #Resistance We are not jealous of these millionaires we speak of. We just want tax laws that help the middle class directly.
Since some people (read: conservatives) are freaking out over the idea of TaXiNg RiCh PeOpLe, letâs talk about tax brackets.
Currently, we have seven tax brackets in the US, at rates between 10% and 37%. All income over $500,000 â whether thatâs $500,001 or $1 billion â is taxed, at most, at 37%. What Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has proposed is increasing the tax bracket so that people who are very rich and making millions of dollars a year would pay a higher tax bracket (70%).
The response is, basically, âBut what if I suddenly get ten million dollars? Then Iâll have to pay 70% of my millions! Thatâll make me worse off than if I merely had nine million!â
This comes up in shit around taxes a lot (âDonât get a raise, youâll have a higher tax bracket!â), so letâs address this using simple math.
Pretend that tax bracket goes like this: if you make $15 or less, you pay no taxes. If you make $16-30 dollars, they take away 10%. If you make $31-45, they take away 15%. At $46 or more, they take away 20%.
That doesnât mean that if you make $16, you have that 10% taken from the total income. You donât get $1.60 taken away from you. You have that 10% taken from every dollar you make over $15. In this case, only $1 is over $15, so only that dollar gets 10% taken out of it (and you lose $0.10). The rest of the money is taxed at the lower rate (which in this case is 0%).
Say that you make $42, so youâre taxed at 15%. So that means that every year, you pay $6.30, right?Â
No. You pay:
Nothing on the first $15 (0% of 15 is $0), plus
10% on all the money between $16 and $30 (10% of 15 is $1.50), plus
15% on all the money between $31 and 42 (15% of 12 is $1.80)
So actually youâre only paying $3.30. You have $38.70 left over.
Now you get a raise. You make $50, which pushes you into the next highest tax bracket. Oh, no, that means that they'll take away 20% of your $50, so youâll have to spend a whole $10!
No. Letâs do the math again.
You pay:
Nothing on the first $15 (0% of 15 is $0), plus
10% on all the money between $16 and $30 (10% of 15 is $1.50), plus
15% on all the money between $31 and $45 (15% of 15 is $2.25), plus
20% on all the money over $45 (20% of $5 is $1)
So actually, youâre only paying $4.75. You have $45.25 left over.
So if thereâs a 70% tax bracket on, say, 10 million dollars or more, it doesnât mean that the second you make 10 million (something that almost no one in this country makes to begin with), you start getting taxed at 70% and they take away 7 million. The first $9,999,999 are still taxed in the lower brackets. They just take away 70 cents from the ten millionth dollar.
Winnie Byanyima brought the hammer all the way DOWN!!
1) Millions of pounds from the Queenâs private estate has been invested in a Cayman Islands fund â and some of her money went to a retailer accused of exploiting poor families.
2) Prince Charlesâs estate made a big profit on a stake in his friendâs offshore firm.
3) Extensive offshore dealings by Donald Trumpâs cabinet members, advisers and donors, including substantial payments from a firm co-owned by Vladimir Putinâs son-in-law to the shipping group of the US commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross.
4) Twitter and Facebook received hundreds of millions of dollars in investments that can be traced back to Russian state financial institutions.
5) The tax-avoiding Cayman Islands trust managed by the Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeauâs chief moneyman.
6) The Formula One champion Lewis Hamilton avoided taxes on a ÂŁ17m jet using an Isle of Man scheme.
7) A previously unknown $450m offshore trust that has sheltered the wealth of Lord Ashcroft.
8) Oxford and Cambridge and top US universities invested offshore, with some of the money going into fossil fuel industries.
9) The man managing Angolaâs sovereign wealth fund invested it in projects he stood to profit from.
10) Apple secretly moved parts of its empire to Jersey after a row over its tax affairs.
11) How the sportswear giant Nike stays one step ahead of the taxman.
12) The billions in tax refunds by the Isle of Man and Malta to the owners of private jets and luxury yachts.
13) Offshore cash helped fund Steve Bannonâs attacks on Hillary Clinton.
14) The secret loan and alliance used by the London-listed multinational Glencore in its efforts to secure lucrative mining rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
15) The complex offshore webs used by two Russian billionaires to buy stakes in Arsenal and Everton football clubs.
16) Stars of the BBC hit sitcom Mrs Brownâs Boys used a web of offshore companies to avoid tax.
17) British celebrities including Gary Lineker used an arrangement that let them avoid tax when selling homes in Barbados.
18) Prominent Brexit campaigners have put money offshore.
19) An ex-minister who defended tax avoidance has a Bahamas trust fund.
20) The Dukes of Westminster pumped millions into secretive offshore firms.
21) A tax haven lobby group boasted of âsuperb penetrationâ at the top of the UK government before a G8 summit that was expected to bring in greater offshore transparency.
22) The law firm at the centre of the Paradise Papers leak was criticised for 'persistent failuresâ on terrorist financing and money laundering rules.
23) Seven Republican super-donors keep money in tax havens.
24) A top Democratic donor built up a vast $8bn private wealth fund in Bermuda.
25) The schemes used to avoid tax on UK property deals.
26) The celebrities, from Harvey Weinstein to Shakira, with offshore interests.
27) How a private equity firm tried to extract ÂŁ890m from a struggling care home operator by making it take out a costly loan.
28) Trumpâs close ally Robert Kraft, the New England Patriots owner, is the longtime owner of an offshore firm.
29) One of the worldâs biggest touts used an offshore firm to avoid tax on profits from reselling Adele and Ed Sheeran tickets.
If nearly a decade interviewing the wealth managers for the 1% taught me anything, it is that the ultra-rich and the ultra-poor have a lot more in common than stereotypes might lead you to believe.
In conversation, wealth managers kept coming back to the flamboyant vices of their clients. It was quite unexpected, in the course of discussing tax avoidance, to hear professional service providers say things like:
âIâve told my colleagues: âIf I ever become like some of our clients, shoot me.â Because they are really immoral people â too much time on their hands, and all the money means they have no limits. I was actually told by one client not to bring my wife on a trip to Monaco unless I wanted to see her get hit on by 10 guys. The local sport, he said, was picking up other menâs wives.â
The clients of this Geneva-based wealth manager also âbelieve that they are descended from the pharaohs, and that they were destined to inherit the earthâ.
If a poor person voiced such beliefs, he or she might well be institutionalized; for those who work with the wealthy, however, such âeccentricitiesâ are all in a dayâs work. Indeed, an underappreciated irony of accelerating economic inequality has been the way it has exposed behaviors among the ultra-rich that mirror the supposed âpathologiesâ of the ultra-poor.
In fact, one of the London-based wealth managers I interviewed said that a willingness to accept with equanimity behavior that would be considered outrageous in others was an informal job requirement. Clients, he said, specifically chose wealth managers not just on technical competence, but on their ability to remain unscandalized by the private lives of the ultra-rich: âThey [the clients] have to pick someone they want to know everything about them: about Motherâs lesbian affairs, Brotherâs drug addiction, the spurned lovers bursting into the room.â Many of these clients are not employed and live off family largesse, but no one calls them lazy.
As Lane and Harburg put it in the libretto of the musical Finianâs Rainbow:
When a rich man doesnât want to work
Heâs a bon vivant, yes, heâs a bon vivant
But when a poor man doesnât want to work
Heâs a loafer, heâs a lounger
Heâs a lazy good for nothing, heâs a jerk
When the wealthy are revealed to be drug addicts, philanderers, or work-shy, the response is â at most â a frisson of tabloid-level curiosity, followed by a collective shrug.
Behaviors indulged in the rich are not just condemned in the poor, but used as a justification to punish them, denying them access to resources that keep them alive, such as healthcare and food assistance. Discussion of poverty has become almost impossible without moral outrage directed at lazy âwelfare queensâ, âcrackheadsâ and other drug addicts, and the âpromiscuous poorâ (a phrase that has cropped up again and again in discussions of public benefits over more than a century).
These disparate perceptions arenât just evidence of hypocrisy; they are literally a matter of life and death. In the US, the widespread belief that the poor are simply lazy has led many states to impose work requirements on aid recipients âeven those who have been medically classified as disabled. Limiting aid programs in this way has been shown to shorten recipientsâ lives: rather than the intended consequence of pushing recipients into paid employment, the restrictions have simply left them without access to medical care or a sufficient food supply. Thus, in one of the richest counties in America, a boy living in poverty died of a toothache; there were no protests, and nothing changed.
Meanwhile, the âbillionaireâ in the White House starts his days at 11am â the rest of the morning is coyly termed âexecutive timeâ â and is known for his frequent holidays. âNice work if you can get it,â quipped an opinion piece in the Washington Post.
We donât hear much about laziness, drug addiction or promiscuity among the wealthiest members of society because â unlike Trump â most billionaires are not public figures and go to great lengths to seek privacy. Thus the motto of one London-based wealth management firm: âI want to be invisible.â This company, like many other service providers to the ultra-rich, specializes in preserving secrecy for clients. The wealthy people I studied not only had wealth managers but often dedicated staff members who killed negative stories about them in the media and kept their names off the Forbes ârich listâ.
Many even present themselves as homeless â for tax purposes â despite owning multiple residences. For the ultra-rich, having no fixed residence provides major legal and financial advantages; this is exemplified by the case of the wealthy businessman who acquired eight different nationalities in order to avoid taxes on his fortune, and by the UK native I interviewed in his Dubai apartment building:
âI am not tax resident anywhere. The tax man says âshow me a utility billâ, and the only utility bill I can present is for the house I own in Thailand, and itâs in a language that the European authorities arenât familiar with. With all the mobility going on in the world, international marriages, governments canât keep up with people.â
Meanwhile, the poor can end up being âresident nowhereâ because no one will allow them to stay in one place for very long; as the sociologist Cristobal Young has shown, the majority of migrants are poor people. In addition, the poor are routinely evicted from housing on the slightest pretext, frequently driving them into homeless shelters â which are in turn forced to move when local homeowners engage in nimby (not in my back yard) protests. Even the design of public spaces is increasingly organized to deny the poor a place to alight, however temporarily.
It is as if the right to move around, to take up space, and to direct your own life as you see fit have become luxury goods, available to those who can pay instead of being human rights. For the rich, deviance from social norms is nearly consequence-free, to the point where outright criminality is tolerated: witness the collective shrug that greeted revelations of massive intergenerational tax fraud in the Trump family.
For the poor, however, even the most minor deviance from othersâ expectations â like buying ice cream or soft drinks with food stamps â results in stigmatization, limits on their autonomy, and deprivation of basic human needs. This makes life far more nasty, brutish and short for those on the lowest rungs of the socio-economic ladder, creating a chasm of more than 20 years in life expectancy between rich and poor. This appears to some as a fully justified consequence of âpersonal responsibilityâ â the poor deserve to die because of their moral failings.
So while the behavior of the ultra-rich gets an ever-widening scope of social leeway, the lives of the poor are foreshortened in every sense. Once upon a time, they were urged to eat cake; now the cake earns them a public scolding.
Government is supposed to address the problems a country is facing. Global warming, infrastructure collapse, funding failures in education, research, the point of government is to ensure that a country is thriving based on its principles.
The GOP tax bill doesnât address any of our countryâs pressing problems. Weâre suffering from a massive underinvestment in infrastructure, but instead of coming up with a way to fund these projects, weâre repealing the estate tax. Instead of better funding academic programs and scientific research, weâre cutting corporate taxes without fixing the loopholes that help corporations avoid paying taxes in the first place.
This disconnect between what the government is doing and actual governance is jarring, not only because it will put America further behind rising superpowers like China, but also because it erodes Americansâ trust in democracy. Why vote, why participate in democracy, why believe in democracy if it doesnât solve our problems?
This tax bill isnât just a bad bill. It contributes to an existential crisis in America that only continues to deepen.
can you please explain how not using facebook, or shopping off amazon means i still give them money or the same amount of money? legit question. i don't understand those tweets.
What Brandon is saying here is that because these mega-corporations all use public infrastructure to run the logistics of their operations whilst avoiding paying taxes, it is the American taxpayer that is subsidizing the profits they enjoy by avoiding said taxes. This is true whether you shop with them or not.
You can take this even further with companies like Amazon and Wal-Mart who pay their workers such meager salaries that they need to go on public assistance and even encourage them to do so. This means that state funds are going towards subsidizing Amazon and Wal-Martâs worker exploitation all in the name of increasing their profits.Â
âGive me five minutes to explain taxes to you: The top marginal tax rate is currently 39.6 percent, which remember, is an altogether different thing from the effective tax rate that wealthy people end up actually paying after taking advantage of various tax loopholes. What does that even mean - a âmarginal taxâ rate of 39.6 percent? Does it mean the average person pays 39.6% in taxes? No. Does it mean that the income earners in the top one percent pays 39.6% in taxes? NO! Hereâs what a marginal tax rate of 39.6% means: First, as of 2013 the top tax rate for individuals currently doesnât begin unless you earn $406,750 dollars. Actually, that tax rate doesnât even take effect until you make $406,750 + $1 dollar. Got that part? Thatâs important. Hereâs the tricky detail that most people miss: the 39.6% tax rate is only applicable on anything OVER $406,750 dollars. So if you made $406,752 dollars, then only two ($2) of those dollars will be taxed at the highest rate of 39.6%âŠand the other $406,750 is not. Of course, this does not take into account the numerous tax loopholes that I alluded to earlier. Thus, if the top marginal tax rate is 39.6 percent, then after using any number of tax loopholes, write offs and various other cheats, itâs entirely possible earn over $406,750 dollars per year and still pay even less in taxes than a working class American earning much less. SN: this applies only to people who do actual work for a paycheck. If, on the other hand, your primary income is from inheritance or stock investments and you pay all your bills off of that interest (aka âcapital gainsâ), then your taxes work differently altogether (hint: theyâre even lower). Take multi-billionaire Mitt Romney, for example. In 2010 he only paid an effective (real) tax rate of 13.9 percent, odds are thatâs much lower than the tax rate you (or your parents) just paid. Hereâs the last thing you should remember: Only one percent of Americans make $400,750 a year or higher. Stated differently, the top income tax rate effects around 3.5 million âout of 350,000,000 Americans. And thatâs only on the dollars ABOVE $400,750. BOO HOO right? Approximately 3.5 million Americans might, maybe, perhaps *possibly* have to pay the top federal income tax rateâŠbut only on anything above $406,750 dollarsâŠand only if they refuse to take advantage of ridiculously huge tax loopholes so big you could fly a jumbo jet through them. THAT is what conservatives are crying about when they complain about the top tax rate. Thatâs it.â
â This is why whining about the top tax rate is a joke and Republicans are the party for the Greedy One Percent (and the deluded suckers âfuture millionairesâ who repeatedly vote for them)
In the coming days, you will hear this response from the defenders of our rotten status quo. âWhat the Paradise Papers has exposed is legal, so what is the problem?â They have an agenda, of course. They want to demonise the very concept of taxation because they want to roll back the state and construct a free-market âutopiaâ which, in practical terms, would be dystopian for the vast majority.
Owen Jones highlights what the Paradise Papers reveal in how elites are refusing to help the populace and how the loopholes are hurting society. As Jones goes on to note on Britain:
The state is punitive when it comes to, say, benefitfraudsters or thousands of young people criminalised for arbitrarily banned drugs, but uses kid gloves when it comes to our shameless uber-wealthy elite. The colossally destructive behaviour of the rich is permitted; the infractions of the poor are deemed intolerable.
As Owen Jones illuminates current society has been set as following:
One rule for those at the top, another for everyone else.Â
In this age of austerity, in which public services are being axed, the Pararise Papers highlights a greater ill in the practice of austerity as tax avoidance is set as such. As Owen Jones end his article:
A democratic revolution is surely coming in the western world, and this shameless, decadent elite only have themselves to blame.
1) Millions of pounds from the Queenâs private estate has been invested in a Cayman Islands fund â and some of her money went to a retailer accused of exploiting poor families.
2) Prince Charlesâs estate made a big profit on a stake in his friendâs offshore firm.
3) Extensive offshore dealings by Donald Trumpâs cabinet members, advisers and donors, including substantial payments from a firm co-owned by Vladimir Putinâs son-in-law to the shipping group of the US commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross.
4) Twitter and Facebook received hundreds of millions of dollars in investments that can be traced back to Russian state financial institutions.
5) The tax-avoiding Cayman Islands trust managed by the Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeauâs chief moneyman.
6) The Formula One champion Lewis Hamilton avoided taxes on a ÂŁ17m jet using an Isle of Man scheme.
7) A previously unknown $450m offshore trust that has sheltered the wealth of Lord Ashcroft.
8) Oxford and Cambridge and top US universities invested offshore, with some of the money going into fossil fuel industries.
9) The man managing Angolaâs sovereign wealth fund invested it in projects he stood to profit from.
10) Apple secretly moved parts of its empire to Jersey after a row over its tax affairs.
11) How the sportswear giant Nike stays one step ahead of the taxman.
12) The billions in tax refunds by the Isle of Man and Malta to the owners of private jets and luxury yachts.
13) Offshore cash helped fund Steve Bannonâs attacks on Hillary Clinton.
14) The secret loan and alliance used by the London-listed multinational Glencore in its efforts to secure lucrative mining rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
15) The complex offshore webs used by two Russian billionaires to buy stakes in Arsenal and Everton football clubs.
16) Stars of the BBC hit sitcom Mrs Brownâs Boys used a web of offshore companies to avoid tax.
17) British celebrities including Gary Lineker used an arrangement that let them avoid tax when selling homes in Barbados.
18) Prominent Brexit campaigners have put money offshore.
19) An ex-minister who defended tax avoidance has a Bahamas trust fund.
20) The Dukes of Westminster pumped millions into secretive offshore firms.
21) A tax haven lobby group boasted of âsuperb penetrationâ at the top of the UK government before a G8 summit that was expected to bring in greater offshore transparency.
22) The law firm at the centre of the Paradise Papers leak was criticised for 'persistent failuresâ on terrorist financing and money laundering rules.
23) Seven Republican super-donors keep money in tax havens.
24) A top Democratic donor built up a vast $8bn private wealth fund in Bermuda.
25) The schemes used to avoid tax on UK property deals.
26) The celebrities, from Harvey Weinstein to Shakira, with offshore interests.
27) How a private equity firm tried to extract ÂŁ890m from a struggling care home operator by making it take out a costly loan.
28) Trumpâs close ally Robert Kraft, the New England Patriots owner, is the longtime owner of an offshore firm.
29) One of the worldâs biggest touts used an offshore firm to avoid tax on profits from reselling Adele and Ed Sheeran tickets.
âOrganised Crimeâ is a more accurate term for multi-billionaire companies that avoid taxes and utilise slave labour, rather than stereotypical mobsters
In the United States, so much of what Americans are thankful for â our families, homes, the foods we enjoy â are the products of ongoing colonization. We might feel grateful for the place we grew up, but that place exists on stolen land. Coming together with family can be challenging, as we all have different ideas of what âAmericaâ is. Yet, if thereâs one thing many folks can agree on, itâs that in the history of this country, Native people were wronged.
With the arrival of European settlers, an estimated 90% of the millions of Indigenous peoples â a number debated to be between 20 and 100 million â died. It wasnât just from disease: The colonizing settlers enacted genocide of Indigenous peoples through starvation, torture, and massacres. It may be true that the âfirst Thanksgivingâ was a peaceful gathering of Pilgrims and Wampanoag people, who together celebrated the Pilgrimsâ first harvest in 1621. But given the massive genocide their ancestors experienced at the hands of European colonizers, itâs hard for Indigenous folks to see this holiday as anything other than a national day of mourning.
âWhatâs wrong with Thanksgiving is not so much the celebration as it is the American mythology that surrounds it,â Alaina Comeaux, an Ishak activist who works to decolonize history, tells Teen Vogue. âIt allows for a certain whitewashed fantasy that erases the devastating impacts of colonization that persist to this day.â
Native peoples continue to fight for their lands and sovereignty while facing exceptional rates of poverty, suicide, and sexual violence, so itâs way past time for more Americans to acknowledge the difficult truths at the heart of Thanksgiving. If youâd like to do your part to help rewrite the story at your gathering this year, here are some ways you can start working toward a more just future.
Continue reading
đž: Getty Images
âMajor hypocrisyâ: US govt-funded agency admits cannabis can kill cancer cells:http://theglobalelite.org/major-hypocrisy-us-govt-funded-agency-admits-cannabis-can-kill-cancer-cells/
Take a moment and recognize the incredible contribution you made to your community and your country by voting in the midterm elections earlier this week. You exercised your right to vote and you made your voice heard. That is no small feat.
The results of the election may have left some of you disappointed, but we wanted to point out just how much new diversity and representation people like you voted into office. Our leaders should reflect the diversity of the communities they serve, and this year you elected a whole bunch of firsts:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, representing New Yorkâs 14th Congressional District, becomes the youngest woman ever elected to the U.S. Congress.
Rashida Tlaib, Michigan, is the first Muslim woman to be elected into Congress.Â
Ilhan Omar, Minnesota, is the first Somali American to be elected in Congress.
Ayanna Pressley becomes Massachusettsâ first Black Congresswoman.
Jared Polis, Colorado, is the first openly gay man elected governor in the United States.
Sharice Davids becomes one of the first Native American and openly lesbian woman to be elected to Congress.
Deb Haaland is also one of the first Native American women elected to Congress.
Letitia James becomes the first woman in New York to be elected as Attorney General, the first African-American woman to be elected statewide office, and the first Black person to serve as Attorney General.
Jahana Hayes is the first Black woman to represent Connecticut in Congress.
Massachusetts voted to maintain its anti-discrimination law protecting trans and nonbinary people.
Florida passes Amendment 4, which restores voting rights to 1.4 million ex-felons who have completed their sentences.
This was all done by you. You made these monumental changes happen with the power of your vote.
Letâs remember: it isnât over. Voting isnât the end. Continue to volunteer in your communities and attend events to keep your community in check. Remember that change rarely comes without action. Take action.
Thank you, Tumblr.
instead of gasoline and oil. Ulf Dahlström had several fascinating years working with Meyer on his projects, which took him into some extraordinary and mind-blowing areas, of how we understand the world we are living in. *  Is FREE ENERGY a possibility or even a reality? And why is it hidden from the global population? * Â
Did Nikola Tesla already discover the secrets of the universe, and could bend time and space to make Time Travel possible? *  Did Time Traveler Al Bielek, a friend to Ulf Dahlstöm, really take part in the Philadelphia Experiment in 1943 and end up time-traveling to 1983, and from then on to the years 2137,  2749 and 6037? * Â
Quantum secrets and the connection to the spirit world. Mind over matter? Energy and vibration is the key to understanding the link between science and spirit. * Parallel dimensions in an infinite Multiverse. Could that be real? * WATER! Is water really pure energy that reacts to the human mind and intentions? *Â
Remote viewing and out-of-body and near-death experiences! * What happens to us when we die and the soul leaves the body? * Why are so many secrets kept from us? Ulf Dahlström is direct, informational and sharp to the point, who has had a long career within the world of science and is now speaking out.Â
 This interesting, in-depth and educational hard-talk conversation between Ulf Dahlström and Age Of Truth TV presenter Lucas Alexander, took place at the Open Mind Conference in Audonicon, Skanderborg, Denmark .
ECLIPSE
To feel really loved, are you more sensitive to gifts and actions, physical touch, time spent together or encouraging words? Do you really know what is your language of love?
For more quizzes, click here
1. Stay mindfully present as impersonal awareness with your thoughts and emotions.
2. Step aside and create some non-judgmental, witnessing space (distance) from the perceived problem in order to remain open and objective.
3. Simply observe and dis-identify (without any emotional reaction or bias) with the mental activities currently being played out. Â Diffuse your energetic association to what you are perceiving as a âproblemâ. It is enough to become a silent, unmoved observer to the whole thinking process.
4. Respond with Presence from the clear space of neutrality, for a creative solution to emerge.
~Anon I mus (Spiritually Anonymous)