No To Ai Art - Blog Posts
Ai "artists" suck :/
Like i get wanting to create sth but just learn art instead!!! First Ai steals artists work without permission and then replaces them, it's just shitty.
Like either pay an artist or become one, ai should have been something to make creating art easier not something that replaces artists and steals their work
i wish all the ai “artists” a very go. die
Ai art isn’t art just shit
Sonic approves
A good day to spite the AI scum innit (click cuz tumblr kirby'd the quality)
Oh damn the Catholics have joined in on the war against AI "art".
I heard about the AI Studio Ghibli situation so I drew this to feel slightly less enraged 😤
QUEEEEEN
I had to erase Loid's imaginary hand 😍😍
I'm tired of seeing wonderful Spy x family art but then I get closer and see that it's AI dkdndjd So pick up your pencil 🔥🔥 (or in my case finger)
pov: ai artists when their ai speed paint gets exposed for being, well, ai
Reblog to kill it faster
wip
also ignore how mint wafer cookie has man boobs its just for making sure i line up his body correctly lmao
i only vaguely remember the fucking gordon ramsay commercial they had (milli my beloved)
hi guys i’m not dead
yo i finally posted on my rotting deviantart account (i don’t draw weird stuff, dw)
Where’s Metallica when you need them?
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
Amen to that
Oh damn the Catholics have joined in on the war against AI "art".